A finance break clause, often called a ‘finance condition’ or ‘subject to finance’ clause, is a critical component in many real estate and business purchase agreements. It offers the buyer a safeguard, allowing them to terminate the agreement if they are unable to secure the necessary financing to complete the transaction within a specified timeframe.
The core purpose of the finance break clause is to protect the buyer from being legally obligated to purchase an asset without the means to pay for it. Imagine agreeing to buy a house, only to be denied a mortgage. Without a finance break clause, you could be sued for breach of contract and potentially lose your deposit. This clause provides an exit strategy, mitigating this significant financial risk.
Typically, the clause outlines a specific period, often 14 to 21 days, within which the buyer must obtain unconditional finance approval. The exact duration is negotiable and should be realistic given current market conditions and the complexity of the financing required. The agreement should clearly define what constitutes “finance approval.” It usually means a formal, written commitment from a lender to provide the necessary funds, subject only to standard conditions such as valuation and title search, which are routine and reasonably expected to be met.
To invoke the finance break clause, the buyer is generally required to demonstrate that they have made genuine and reasonable efforts to obtain financing. This might involve providing evidence of loan applications submitted to multiple lenders, rejection letters, and correspondence with brokers. Simply changing one’s mind or deciding not to pursue financing is typically not sufficient grounds for termination. The buyer must act in good faith.
The finance break clause also often stipulates a process for notifying the seller of the buyer’s inability to secure financing. This usually involves written notice, delivered within the specified timeframe, accompanied by supporting documentation demonstrating the efforts to obtain financing and the reasons for the denial. Failing to provide proper notification within the stipulated timeframe could result in the waiver of the finance break clause, binding the buyer to the agreement regardless of their financing status.
While beneficial to the buyer, the finance break clause can be a source of anxiety for the seller. It introduces uncertainty into the transaction, as the deal is contingent on the buyer’s ability to secure financing. Sellers may prefer offers without a finance break clause, especially in competitive markets. However, accepting an offer with a well-defined and reasonable finance break clause is often preferable to an offer from a buyer who may ultimately be unable to complete the purchase, leading to delays and potential losses.
Negotiating the terms of the finance break clause is crucial for both buyers and sellers. Buyers should ensure the timeframe is adequate and the definition of “finance approval” is clear. Sellers should ensure the clause includes provisions requiring the buyer to demonstrate genuine efforts to obtain financing and provides a clear process for notification and termination. Ultimately, a well-drafted finance break clause protects both parties and helps facilitate a smoother transaction.