Carol Willis’s seminal work, “Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago,” provides a compelling argument against the common architectural maxim “form follows function.” Instead, Willis posits that the towering structures that define the skylines of New York and Chicago are primarily shaped by the relentless forces of real estate economics and the desire for profit maximization. The book meticulously traces the historical interplay between building technology, land value, and zoning regulations, revealing how these financial factors dictated the physical form of skyscrapers.
Willis meticulously deconstructs the myth of the architect as the sole creative force behind these iconic buildings. She argues that while architects certainly play a crucial role in design and aesthetics, their creative vision is invariably constrained and ultimately molded by the economic realities of the real estate market. The relentless pursuit of rentable square footage, driven by the need to recoup land costs and generate profit, dictates the size, shape, and overall layout of skyscrapers.
The book examines the evolution of skyscraper design through specific historical periods. It analyzes how advancements in steel frame construction and elevator technology, while enabling taller buildings, were ultimately harnessed to exploit increasingly valuable urban land. Zoning laws, often perceived as tools for urban planning and aesthetic control, are presented as mechanisms that inadvertently incentivized particular building forms. For example, setback requirements, designed to allow sunlight to reach the streets, resulted in the distinctive tiered profiles of many early skyscrapers, not because architects preferred this aesthetic, but because it maximized rentable space within the constraints of the regulations.
Willis highlights the role of developers and financiers as key players in the shaping of the cityscape. These individuals, driven by investment strategies and profit motives, often exerted significant influence over architectural decisions. The book demonstrates how the perceived market value of certain building features, such as prime corner offices or panoramic views, drove the design process, often at the expense of architectural innovation or aesthetic considerations that did not directly translate into financial returns.
“Form Follows Finance” is not merely a critique of architectural theory; it’s a profound commentary on the socio-economic forces that shape our urban environment. By meticulously documenting the interplay between financial imperatives and architectural outcomes, Willis offers a powerful and insightful perspective on the evolution of the skyscraper and its lasting impact on the modern city. Her work remains essential reading for anyone seeking to understand the complex relationship between architecture, finance, and the built environment.