Sean Egan is a prominent figure in the world of finance, primarily recognized for his role as a co-founder and president of Egan-Jones Ratings Company (EJR). EJR is a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), offering credit ratings and research. What distinguishes EJR from larger, established rating agencies like Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch is its business model and its outspoken criticisms of the traditional credit rating system.
Egan’s career began on Wall Street, where he gained experience in various financial roles. Dissatisfied with the perceived biases and conflicts of interest within the established rating agencies, he co-founded EJR in 1995. His core belief was that the traditional “issuer pays” model, where companies pay rating agencies to rate their debt, created inherent conflicts. EJR operates on a “subscriber pays” model, deriving revenue from investors who subscribe to its ratings and research. This model, Egan argues, allows for greater independence and objectivity in credit assessments.
EJR gained significant attention during the 2008 financial crisis, as the company had issued warnings about the risks associated with mortgage-backed securities and other complex financial instruments well before the crisis unfolded. This contrasted sharply with the ratings provided by the larger agencies, who were often accused of assigning overly optimistic ratings to these assets. Egan and EJR were vocal critics of the regulatory framework that allowed these inflated ratings to persist, arguing that it incentivized risky behavior and contributed to the severity of the crisis.
However, EJR has also faced its own challenges. In 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged EJR with making material misstatements in its application to become an NRSRO and with violating conflict-of-interest rules. EJR settled the charges without admitting or denying the allegations. This event sparked debate about the scrutiny faced by smaller rating agencies compared to their larger counterparts.
Despite the controversies, Sean Egan remains a vocal advocate for reform in the credit rating industry. He frequently speaks on financial issues and is a proponent of greater transparency and accountability in the ratings process. He believes that independent and objective credit ratings are crucial for investors to make informed decisions and for maintaining the stability of the financial system. While his views can be seen as contrarian, they have undoubtedly contributed to the ongoing discussion about the role and responsibility of credit rating agencies in the global economy.