Conventional finance theory, the cornerstone of much of modern financial thought, rests upon a set of core assumptions about how investors behave. These assumptions, while often simplified for analytical purposes, are crucial for understanding the models and frameworks used to value assets and make investment decisions. One of the most fundamental of these assumptions is that investors are rational.
Rationality, in this context, doesn’t necessarily mean that investors possess perfect foresight or are always correct. Instead, it implies that investors consistently act in their own best economic self-interest. They strive to maximize their expected utility, carefully weighing the potential risks and rewards of each investment opportunity. This utility maximization is typically expressed in terms of wealth; more wealth is generally preferred to less.
This pursuit of self-interest translates into a few key behavioral characteristics. First, investors are assumed to be risk-averse. Given two investments with the same expected return, they will prefer the one with lower risk. This risk aversion explains why riskier assets, like stocks, generally offer higher average returns over time than safer assets, like bonds. Investors demand compensation for bearing additional risk.
Second, investors are assumed to have consistent preferences. Their risk tolerance and investment goals remain relatively stable over time, allowing them to make informed decisions based on a long-term perspective. They aren’t swayed by short-term market fluctuations or emotional biases that could lead to impulsive or irrational choices.
Furthermore, conventional finance assumes that investors have access to and correctly interpret all available information. This assumption of market efficiency implies that asset prices reflect all known information about the asset’s value. This makes it difficult, if not impossible, for investors to consistently outperform the market by identifying undervalued or overvalued securities. Any new information is quickly incorporated into prices, eliminating any potential arbitrage opportunities.
Another critical assumption is that investors act independently. Their decisions are not influenced by the actions or opinions of other investors. This independence ensures that market prices are driven by objective assessments of asset value, rather than herd behavior or speculative bubbles.
Finally, conventional finance assumes investors are homogeneous, meaning they share similar beliefs and expectations about future returns and risks. While this assumption is a simplification, it allows for the development of models that can be applied across a broad range of investors.
It’s important to acknowledge that these assumptions are simplifications of reality. Behavioral finance, a field that challenges conventional finance, highlights how cognitive biases, emotional factors, and social influences can lead investors to deviate from rational behavior. However, understanding the assumptions of conventional finance is crucial for comprehending the foundation upon which much of modern financial theory is built.